USPTO serial 87195510
KONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin S. Hennessy
ERIN S. HENNESSY BRACEWELL LLP701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 6200SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the operational overview and control of devices and the production of analytics for the purpose of managing renewable assets; downloadable cloud-computing software for connecting unlimited devices to a cloud computing platform; Computer software for intelligence data analysis, risk analysis, statistical analysis, data visualization, pattern recognition, trend analysis, anomaly detection, forecasting future conditions, data monitoring and user notification; Computer software for data analysis, data mining, automation of predictive analytic processes, forecasting and reporting of possible predictive outcomes, application of data analytics and for operating a digital marketplace connecting unlimited devices to a cloud-based platform | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring hosted computer software platforms for intelligence analysis, risk analysis, statistical analysis, data visualization, pattern recognition, trend analysis, anomaly detection, forecasting future conditions, data monitoring and user notification; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring hosted computer software for intelligence analysis, risk analysis, statistical analysis, data visualization, pattern recognition, trend analysis, anomaly detection, forecasting future conditions, data monitoring and user notification; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software platforms for data analysis, data mining, automation of predictive analytic processes, forecasting and reporting of possible predictive outcomes, application of data analytics and for operating a digital marketplace connecting unlimited devices to a cloud-based platform; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for data analysis, data mining, automation of predictive analytic processes, forecasting and reporting of possible predictive outcomes, application of data analytics and for operating a digital marketplace connecting unlimited devices to a cloud-based platform; providing temporary use of web based cloud-computing software for connecting unlimited devices to a cloud computing platform | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Envision (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Envision (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KONG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |