Drawing for ORCHESTRATING BEAUTIFUL ENERGY

USPTO serial 87195526

ORCHESTRATING BEAUTIFUL ENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORCHESTRATING BEAUTIFUL ENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Rommelmann

Douglas W. Rommelmann BRACEWELL LLPP.O. Box 61389Houston, TX 77208-1389UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the operational overview and control of devices and the production of analytics for the purpose of managing renewable assets; downloadable or web based cloud-computing software for connecting unlimited devices to a cloud computing platformACTIVE—
039Distribution of energy, namely, management of the supply and demand of renewable energy via the two way flow of information via electricity and connected devicesACTIVE—
042Hosting the software of others on a virtual private server, namely, operating a server that makes available software for managing, from a single unified interface, multiple servers and hosted devices, or for managing internet-of-things enabled devices; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for management of data analytics and for operating a digital marketplace connecting unlimited devices to a cloud-based platform; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring computer software for management of data analytics and for operating a digital marketplace connecting unlimited devices to a cloud-based platform; providing temporary use of web based cloud computing software for connecting unlimited devices to a cloud computing platformACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 31, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 7, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 3, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Dec 3, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 3, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 30, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 30, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 26, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 26, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance