Drawing for ATOAAS

USPTO serial 87196079

ATOAAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ATOAAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENDELL RENEE KELLY

2418 NORTH CAPITOL ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042information technology consultation; Consulting in the field of computer services, namely, providing compliance and management for information technology systems; risk mitigation consulting and management for information technology systems; information technology system evaluation for complianceABANDONEDSep 14, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 28, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 28, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2022OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 7, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 26, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance