USPTO serial 87196097
GENDERNOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENDERNOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Bross
11 DEEP RUNCOHASSET, MA 02025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, books, articles and case studies in the fields of gender brain and thought process differences and their impact on the workplace | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online, non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, journals, magazines, e-books, white papers, case studies, articles and blog posts in the field of gender brain and thought process differences and their impact on the work place; Education services, namely, providing online non-downloadable video, slide decks and computer-mediated presentations and webinars in the field of gender brain and thought process differences and their impact on the work place | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |