Drawing for MONEYGRAM KAMELEON

USPTO serial 87196577

MONEYGRAM KAMELEON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONEYGRAM KAMELEON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer C. Debrow

JENNIFER C. DEBROW GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.500 IDS CENTER, 80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in money transfer services, electronic funds transfer services, and bill payment services, namely, software for processing bill payment and money transfer transactions over a computer networkACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, money transfer services, electronic funds transfer services, bill payment services, automated clearing house services, electronic transfer of government monetary benefits, electronic check re-presentment services, conversion of negotiable instruments to electronic payment transactions, processing payments to third parties, direct debit accounting services, electronic credit and debit transactions, official check processing and issuance, electronic debit card and credit card transaction processing, check and draft processing; financial risk management services; processing monetary government benefit payments; processing and disbursement of payments associated with coupons, rebates, and gift certificates for third partiesACTIVE—
042Computer software development, namely, development of web pages and software for third parties for use in bill payment over computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 11, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2016AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance