Drawing for PACKSIZE ON DEMAND PACKAGING

USPTO serial 87196725

PACKSIZE ON DEMAND PACKAGING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKSIZE ON DEMAND PACKAGING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Stringham

John C. Stringham WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Custom packaging machines for producing corrugated packaging at the moment when needed for packaging goods; packaging machines and parts thereof; packaging machines, namely, custom automated gluing machinesACTIVE—
009Custom packaging operating system software for use in managing stand-alone and network packaging optimization operations and production. Custom software for orchestrating activity flow within warehouses and distribution centersACTIVE—
016Continuous sheet paper and sheet paper, recycled paper, packing materials made of recycled paper, corrugated paper, corrugated fiberboard; Continuous corrugated cardboard; corrugated cardboardACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of hardware for others to operate and manage custom packaging systemsACTIVE—
039Product as a Service services, namely, rental of packaging machines; Providing consulting in the field of packaging of goodsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of corrugated packaging at the moment when needed out of corrugated fiberboard; Product as a Service, namely, custom manufacturing of corrugated packaging for custom packaging systemsACTIVE—
042Design and development of custom packaging hardware and software; Technological consulting services in the field of custom packaging systems, namely, design and development of computer hardware and software; Development and implementation of software, hardware and technology solutions for the purpose of providing custom packaging systems; Consulting services, namely, designing, creating, implementing and maintaining of software for others to operate and manage custom packaging systems; design of computer hardware for others to operate and manage custom packaging systems; Providing consulting in the field of material handling, namely, packaging design consulting services featuring integration and efficiency optimization services in the field of material handling; providing computer and software consulting and integration services in the field of material handlingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2019CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2019COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 2, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 2, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 25, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance