Drawing for THEMAVEN

USPTO serial 87196910

THEMAVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THEMAVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Syed M. Abedi

Syed M. Abedi SEED IP LAW GROUP LLP701 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website featuring interactive technology, namely, hosting a variety of selectable channels, each channel featuring digital content focused on a particular topic or category of topics, with each of the channels being co-branded with a dedicated content provider and a platform provider; providing a website featuring interactive technology, namely, hosting a variety of selectable channels featuring digital video, audio, textual and multimedia content dedicated to particular topics or categories of topics, the channels also providing social networking functions dedicated to the topic or category of topics for the particular channel, enabling users to communicate within the channels to share comments, ratings, and other informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 18, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 5, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 24, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 9, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance