USPTO serial 87196930
GETSWIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GETSWIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah G. Voeller
SARAH G. VOELLER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C.45 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 2700MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transportation and delivery of goods; distribution of goods, namely, delivery of goods for others; packing of articles for transportation; carting of goods, namely transportation of goods; carting services, namely, transportation of goods for others; delivery of goods by road; delivery of cargo; cargo transportation services; delivery of food and drink prepared for consumption; delivery of goods by road; delivery of groceries; food delivery services; gift delivery; freight forwarding; gift wrapping; packing of goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software services provided to businesses and corporations, consumer corporations and consumers in relation to transportation and delivery of consumer goods purchased electronically by means of computers, computer networks and the internet; Computer services, namely, creating computer network-based indexes of information, websites and resources; quality control for others; creating and maintaining blogs for others; electronic data storage; hosting of electronic databases for others; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting software as a service; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable web-based software applications for the arrangement and transportation of goods; online provision of non-downloadable web-based software for the arrangement and transportation of goods; all of the aforesaid services exclusively relating to transportation and delivery of consumer goods purchased electronically by means of computers, computer networks and the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |