Drawing for MSPCONTROL

USPTO serial 87197174

MSPCONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MSPCONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu

Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 West Warm Springs Road, Suite 100Henderson, NV 89014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized database management services; Computerized database management services, namely, updating and maintaining data in computer database systemsACTIVESep 5, 2016
042Server hosting services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for web server and database server management; Rental of computer software; Application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Technical support, namely, providing backup computer programs and facilities; Electronic data storage; Remote online backup of computer data services; IT security, protection and restoration, namely, computer services for remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others for providing security, protection and restoration; Data migration services; Computer software maintenance; Maintenance of websites and hosting on-line web facilities for others; Installation, maintenance and repair of software for computer systems; Installation, maintenance, reparation and updating of computer software; Reconstruction of database systems for others; Reconstitution of databases, namely, recovery of computer data; Hosting of digital content databases on the Internet; Digital compression of data for electronic storage; Computer services, namely, electronic data storage; Electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic dataACTIVESep 5, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 18, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 2, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 8, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 25, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 25, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance