Drawing for CL

USPTO serial 87197248

CL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANTZLER, LAUREN ALEXANDRIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben D. Tobor

BEN D. TOBOR GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1000 LOUISIANA STE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005All purpose disinfectants for household and janitorial use; sanitizing preparations for commercial and institutional use; disinfectant toilet bowl cleaners; pesticides for commercial, industrial, domestic use; insecticides; odor neutralizing preparations for general use on various surfaces; spray sanitizer for bathroom and kitchen use; air deodorizing preparations; hand-sanitizing preparations; and sanitizing wipesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 9, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 9, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 5, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 19, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 19, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance