Drawing for OFFSPEC SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 87197276

OFFSPEC SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFFSPEC SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Trucking services, namely, hauling of refrigerated items and dry goods; Trucking services, namely, hauling of motorized semi-trucks used on the highways in the hauling of commercial goods across the continental statesACTIVEJan 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2019PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Aug 5, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 1, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 31, 2019PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2019ERCFTEAS REQUEST TO CHANGE FILING DATE.—
Feb 27, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 26, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 2018PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Dec 13, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 28, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2017AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 6, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 5, 2017EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 12, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 9, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 25, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 28, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance