USPTO serial 87198091
DXL INVOKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DXL INVOKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Don Thornburgh
DON THORNBURGH DON THORNBURGH LAW CORPORATION466 FOOTHILL BLVD. #220LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CA 91011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software, namely, use of a web content management platform; Providing use of online non-downloadable software, namely, software to track web site user activity, deliver targeted data and information to web site users based on ambient, behavioral, or explicitly provided data, measure user affinity for material through the application of A/B and multivariate testing methods, and capture and report on data submitted by web site users via the application; providing use of online non-downloadable software, namely, computer software code for use in connection with developing, managing, updating, and maintaining websites, intranets, extranets and other web-based data repositories; computer services, namely, maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, customization, configuration, and integration of non-downloadable software for others; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non- downloadable online software development kits to enable others to develop, manage, update, and maintain web sites, intranets, extranets, and other web-based data repositories; Content Management System (CMS) provided as a Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) application that allows users to develop, manage, generate and publish content, websites and web applications online, namely, software as a service (SAAS) services, featuring software for use in developing, managing, generating and publishing content, websites and web applications online; Consulting services in the fields of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Computer software development; Analyzing technology requirements and developing recommendations for computer software and systems and other technology needed to meet those requirements in the field of website content management; Custom computer software development; Computer systems integration services; Systems and software engineering, namely, systems engineering of information technology systems in the nature of design and development of computer software and online computer software systems; Design and development of computer software in the nature of metrics solutions; Quality management services, namely, quality assurance in the field of computer software and information assurance; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the websites, intranets, extranets and other web-based data repositories and the information technology (IT) systems of others; implementation of Content Management System (CMS) software systems for others; implementation of computer technologies, namely, website portals, for others; Website usability testing services; all of the foregoing excluding computer research software that allows corporations and organizations to make faster business decisions by performing real-time analysis and gaining real-time insight into opinions, ideas and dynamics of customers, employees and other individuals and software that allows business users to capture collective thoughts and opinions of a targeted audience in live and/or interactive sessions with real-time analytics | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |