Drawing for PIPEWRITER

USPTO serial 87199117

PIPEWRITER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PIPEWRITER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey P. Thennisch

7111 DIXIE HIGHWAY #210CLARKSTON, MI 48348UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial marking machines for etching and engraving product indicia, part numbers, serial numbers, logos, bar codes, and identifying nomenclature directly on the surface of metals, plastics, ceramics, wood, glass, polymeric and elastomeric products for the purpose of identification and traceabilityACTIVEJan 31, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 2, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 4, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 5, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2019TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 2, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 2, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance