Drawing for MUKTOWN VENTURES

USPTO serial 87201285

MUKTOWN VENTURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUKTOWN VENTURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean E. McConnell

DEAN E. MCCONNELL INDIANO & MCCONNELL9795 CROSSPOINT BLVD.SUITE 185INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46256

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising copywriting; Banner advertising; Internet advertising services; Magazine advertising; Newspaper advertising; Radio advertisingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 16, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 16, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 16, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 16, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 16, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 7, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 19, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance