Drawing for PITCHMAP

USPTO serial 87203246

PITCHMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PITCHMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH V. MYERS III

JOSEPH V. MYERS III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1075 PEACHTREE STREET, NESUITE 2500ATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Customized downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, pamphlets, and white papers about messaging and positioning development in the field of marketing and advertisingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 24, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 24, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 28, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 28, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 25, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 25, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 25, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 25, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 1, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 1, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 20, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 18, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance