USPTO serial 87203504
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Gregory Schivley / Geoffrey D. Aurini
G. GREGORY SCHIVLEY / GEOFFREY D. AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DRIVESUITE 200TROY, MI 48098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Large scale integrated circuits (LSI); Semi-conductors; Semiconductor elements; Semi-conductor wafers; Wafers; Electronic semi-conductors; Electronic integrated circuits; Electronic circuit board; Connectors for electronic circuits; Integrated circuits; Circuit boards provided with integrated circuits; Integrated circuit module; Chips (integrated circuits); Transistors; Printed circuits; Circuit boards; Integrated circuits for use in digital signal processors (dsp); Simulator for semiconductor; Computer software for use in processing semiconductor wafers; Semiconductor component | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |