Drawing for MANTRA BRAND

USPTO serial 87203740

MANTRA BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANTRA BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Omid E. Khalifeh

Omid E. Khalifeh OMNI LEGAL GROUP2029 Century Park East, Suite 438LOS ANGELES, CA 90067United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2020TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Apr 27, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 27, 2020OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 23, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 21, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2018LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN
Sep 29, 2018LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Sep 25, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 25, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 15, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 15, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 17, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 17, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 20, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 18, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance