USPTO serial 87205491
PREBIOTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2017
- Examiner
- MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PREBIOTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ventura, CA, US
Ventura, CA, US
WINTERS, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandy Lipkin
Sandy Lipkin LAW OFFICES OF SANDY LIPKINP.O. BOX 3518VENTURA, CA 93006-3518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Bird food; Cat food; Cattle feed; Dog food; Fish food; Fruit, fresh; Horse feed; Livestock feed; Pet food; Vegetables, fresh; Fresh herbs; all of the foregoing containing prebiotics | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 25, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |