USPTO serial 87207357
STRAIGHT FROM UPSTATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRAIGHT FROM UPSTATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA92 EAST MAIN STREETSUITE 302SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared and/or packaged health food products, namely, fresh, sous-vide and/or vacuum packed entrees, side dishes and prepared and/or packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, lamb, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables, grains and salads; prepared and/or packaged health food products, namely, fresh, sous-vide and/or vacuum packed meat, meatballs, beef, lamb, poultry, fish, seafood, fresh sweet potatoes, mashed potatoes, quinoa, couscous, prepared salads, pasta side dishes, cookies, pancakes, cooked rice, fresh vegetables and cooked vegetables; freshly prepared and/or packaged health food products consisting primarily of meat, lamb, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables, grains and salads for promoting general good health and nutrition and weight loss, for the purposes of improving digestion, metabolism and improving health quality, and for the purposes of increasing energy, burning fat, repairing tissue damage, muscle growth, performance enhancement, increasing metabolism and burning fat during and after exercise; prepared and/or packaged fresh, sous-vide and/or vacuum packed vegetarian, vegan, gluten free, low sodium, sugar-free, preservative-free, natural, organic entrees, side dishes and prepared and/or packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, lamb, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables, grains and salads, and deserts; food kits and/or meal kits consisting primarily of meat, meat substitutes, lamb, poultry, fish, seafood, vegetables, cheese, grains, beans, nuts and edible seeds, and also sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |