Drawing for AUDIOVISOR

USPTO serial 87207558

AUDIOVISOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MALASHEVICH, JASON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOVISOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deidra D. Ritcherson

DEIDRA D. RITCHERSON AMIN, TUROCY & WATSON, LLP127 PUBLIC SQUARE57TH FLOOR, KEY TOWERCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for generating recommendations of hearing settings for devices; computer software for tuning hearing settings for devices; wireless headsets for music streaming and intercommunication for motorcyclists or motorcycle passengers, cyclists, joggers, hikers, sportsmen; car mounted units incorporating microphones and loudspeakers to enable handsfree use of wireless mobile communication devicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 20, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance