Drawing for SPRINGFIELD

USPTO serial 87208000

SPRINGFIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRINGFIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

Charles J. Meyer Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 MONUMENT CIRCLE, SUITE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Replica firearms for recreational purposes; air guns for recreational purposes; compressed air guns for recreational purposes; pellet guns for recreational purposes; replica firearm accessories, namely, magazines, grips, non-telescopic sights and holsters; ammunition for replica firearms for recreational purposes; ammunition for air guns and pellet guns for recreational purposes, namely, metal, rubber, and plastic pellets, and powder ballsACTIVE—
028Airsoft guns for recreational purposes; paintball guns; toy guns; model guns; toy guns adapted as video game accessories; replica toy firearm accessories, namely, holsters; ammunition for paintball guns, toy guns and airsoft guns for recreational purposes, namely, toy plastic projectiles, soft rubber projectiles, paper projectiles, soft-tip darts, soft-foam bullets, and paintballsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 17, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 26, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 12, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2017GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2017EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jan 30, 2017CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance