Drawing for ORGANIC 2

USPTO serial 87208464

ORGANIC 2

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC 2?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandy Lipkin

SANDY LIPKIN LAW OFFICES OF SANDY LIPKINP.O. BOX 3518VENTURA, CA 93006-3518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Organic fungicides and herbicides; Organic insecticides; Organic pesticidesACTIVE
031Organic bird food; Organic cat food; Organic cattle feed; Organic dog food; Organic fish food; Organic horse feed; Organic livestock feed; Organic pet foodACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance