USPTO serial 87208750
ROCKET XTREME MAINEVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCKET XTREME MAINEVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GROVE, OK
GROVE, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY GIBBS
GREGORY GIBBS WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.10655 PARK RUN DR., STE. 100LAS VEGAS, NV 8914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Gambling services in the nature of casino gaming incorporating feature bonus games played on gaming machines, namely, bingo-related games and slot machines; all of the foregoing excluding live poker events and poker tournaments | ABANDONED | Dec 14, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority, a Tribal Enterprise of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
- Other trademarks owned by Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Business Development Authority, a Tribal Enterprise of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ROCKET XTREME MAINEVENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CTDR | CT DECISION: REVERSED AND REMANDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |