USPTO serial 87209159
KEEP GOOD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEEP GOOD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cohen
Michael A. Cohen Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.1211 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1900Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | promotional merchandise, namely, cases for mobile phones, cases for telephones | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | promotional merchandise, namely, stickers and decals | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | promotional merchandise, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hats, toques, bandanas, jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | promotional merchandise, namely, cigarette lighters not for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | restaurant services; bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by This is Blueprint Management Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by This is Blueprint Management Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named KEEP GOOD COMPANY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |