Drawing for ARCAID

USPTO serial 87210205

ARCAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Albrecht

John W. Albrecht Medtronic plc60 Middletown AvenueNorth Haven, CT 06473UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010robotic guidance system for surgical use comprising surgical robots for guiding other surgical instruments along the spinal cord, and computer workstations comprising central processing units, motherboards, specially-adapted mounting platforms, operating system software, medical imaging software, and medical image processors; complementary products for use with surgical guidance systems for surgical users to create a safe surgical environment for patients, surgeons, and staff during general spinal and brain surgery, namely, spinal implants comprised of artificial materials, metal medical screws, mounting platforms specially adapted for surgical instruments, and surgical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2021EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 21, 2021EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2020EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2020EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 28, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 19, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2019EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2019EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 28, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 4, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 17, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance