USPTO serial 87214265
SYCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Farmer
JOHN B. FARMER LEADING-EDGE LAW GROUP, PLC4905 DICKENS ROAD, SUITE 100RICHMOND, VA 23230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Value-added reseller services, namely, distributorship services featuring information technology products and services related to technology infrastructure, including options in the cloud (servers, storage, networks, communication and collaboration systems, video, mobility, security and systems management; Installation, maintenance and repair of Ethernet and wireless networking hardware; Information technology consulting services; Information technology integration services; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology systems of others; Computer project management services; Consulting in the field of information technology project management; Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Installation, repair and maintenance of computer software; Installation and maintenance of computer software; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in information technology security and penetration testing; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in information technology security and penetration testing; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for malware, intrusion, and penetration testing and diagnosis of computers and networks to assess information technology security and vulnerability; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of network and cloud security, cloud computing, information technology, and application systems; Computer system security auditing services; Computer consulting services; Computer system design, installation, testing, and implementation services; Data storage system design, installation, testing, and implementation services; technical advice relating to computers, namely, advice on system configuration, risk management, network security, cloud security, data security and data governance, compliance and data privacy; Software installation, updating, and maintenance services; interconnecting computer hardware and software, namely, integrating computer systems, networks and software | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |