USPTO serial 87214360
BLAZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLAZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis S. Prahl
Dennis S. Prahl LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | data processing apparatus; computer memory devices; computers; computer programs, recorded for collecting data, sound and images in the fields of surveillance and security; computer peripheral devices; recorded computer software for use in capturing and collecting data, sound, and images in the fields of surveillance and security; data processing equipment, namely, couplers; interfaces for computers; microprocessors; computer monitors; television monitors; video monitors; computer central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; computer central processing units (CPU); optical readers; computer programs for use in the management of video systems in the field of surveillance and security; computer programs for use in license plate recognition; computer programs for use in POS integration; computer programs for use in providing business information in the field of surveillance and security; computer programs for use in surveillance; integrated circuit cards; blank smart cards; flashing safety lights; audio- and video-receivers; sound transmitting apparatus; sound recording apparatus; sound reproduction apparatus; video recorders; camcorders; baby monitors; video baby monitors; enlarging apparatus; shutter releases; shutters; cameras; camera filters; speedometers; diaphragms, in the nature of iris diaphragms for cameras; flashlights for use in photography; speedometers for vehicles; objectives for cameras; optical lanterns; optical lamps; optical lenses; magnifying glasses; inspection mirrors; scientific and technical apparatus, namely, optical mirrors; prisms; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical scanners, telescopes, optical readers, optical lenses, optical shutters, optical reflectors, optical scanners, optical and telescopic lens sights; cables, electric; wires, electric; integrated circuits; computer chips; fluorescent screens; video screens; remote control apparatus for televisions, cameras, and computers; locks, electric, none of the aforementioned optical products primarily intended for the hunting and sports shooting industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical research in the fields of technology, information technology, video surveillance equipment, business transactions; engineering services, particularly technical project planning and design engineering of lines for the processing of web products; product development and engineering services for others; research and development of new products for others; information technology consultancy; industrial design; packaging design; packaging design for others; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; recovery of computer data; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; computer system design; duplication of computer programs; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; creating web sites for others; computer software consultancy; rental of web servers; software as a service featuring software for use in point of sale (POS) transactions; information technology consultancy services; off-site data backup; Design and development of computer software for cloud storage of data and video; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) cloud computing systems of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HANGZHOU HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by HANGZHOU HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLAZER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |