Drawing for PRECIOUS CARGO

USPTO serial 87214649

PRECIOUS CARGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECIOUS CARGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel K. Hunnicutt

475 L'Enfant Plaza, SWWashington, DC 20260UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MAILING SERVICES, NAMELY, SORTING, HANDLING, AND RECEIVING PACKAGES AND LETTERSACTIVE—
039DELIVERY SERVICES, NAMELY, PICKUP, TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY OF PACKAGES AND DOCUMENTS BY VARIOUS MODES OF TRANSPORTATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 12, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 7, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 7, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 1, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2019NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 17, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 21, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 21, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2017GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 18, 2017GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 18, 2017CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 10, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance