Drawing for CATNIP INFUSION TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 87216505

CATNIP INFUSION TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUKER, RACHEL EVE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATNIP INFUSION TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan P. Koenig

NATHAN P KOENIG BAY AREA TECHNOLOGY LAW GROUP PC2171 E FRANCISCO BLVD SUITE LSAN RAFAEL, CA 94901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Pet travel bagsACTIVE—
020Chair mats in the nature of a pillow or seat liner; Scratching posts and pads for cats; Device for scratching pets, namely, gloves for scratching pets; Pet ramp; Pet furnitureACTIVE—
021Pet feeding and drinking bowls; Hand-operated devices for scratching pets; Cat litter boxes; Cat litter pans; Liners for cat litter boxes; Filters for use in cat litter boxes; Scoops for the disposal of pet wasteACTIVE—
028Cat toys; Electronic cat toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 28, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 21, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 21, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance