USPTO serial 87218208
2007
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 2007?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian P. Kinder
Brian P. Kinder THE KINDER LAW GROUP, APC19200 VON KARMAN AVENUE, FOURTH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, footwear and ballet shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |