USPTO serial 87218322
VALLEY OF INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2017
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VALLEY OF INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
Temecula, CA
Other trademarks owned by ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
Temecula, CA
Other trademarks owned by ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Rosenstein
ROBERT B. ROSENSTEIN ROSENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES28600 MERCEDES ST, STE 100TEMECULA, CA 92590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting economic development in the California cities of Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula, Wildomar, and surrounding California cities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 7, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VALLEY OF INNOVATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Apr 25, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Apr 25, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 18, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Mar 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Feb 28, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 27, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Feb 27, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Feb 23, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Feb 23, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Feb 22, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 31, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |