USPTO serial 87220524
POKIMAKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POKIMAKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Min K. Chai
MIN K. CHAI MKC LAW GROUP300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR. STE. 1090IRVINE, CA 92620UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Fast-food restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Fast casual restaurants featuring poki bowls, sushi, and other Asian style food menu items; Restaurant; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services; Restaurant and café services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant and hotel services; Restaurant services; Bar and restaurant services; Cafeteria and restaurant services; Catering in fast-food cafeterias; Hotel and restaurant services; Take-out restaurant services | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |