USPTO serial 87220917
BAREFOODS AS NATURE INTENDED... GOOD ALL NATURAL FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAREFOODS AS NATURE INTENDED... GOOD ALL NATURAL FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fayetteville, NC
Fayetteville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ritchie W. Taylor
Ritchie W. Taylor Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A.P.O. Box 20389Raleigh, NC 27619UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bare Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bare Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BAREFOODS AS NATURE INTENDED... GOOD ALL NATURAL FOODS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2019 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |