CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for UNLIMITED CARRYOVER

USPTO serial 87221529

UNLIMITED CARRYOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLIMITED CARRYOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manuel Valcarcel,

CANDICE E KIM GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP1840 CENTURY PARK EAST STE 1900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone services; Telephone communication servicesACTIVENov 27, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2019EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 13, 2018RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 21, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2018RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
May 1, 2018RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
May 1, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 12, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 12, 2018PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Apr 12, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 10, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 6, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance