Drawing for FEELING NADI

USPTO serial 87222235

FEELING NADI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, CLINTON J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEELING NADI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle Levin

MICHELLE LEVIN LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVE 5TH FLWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, hats, and sweatshirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 9, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 27, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 17, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 15, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 15, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 15, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 4, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance