USPTO serial 87222270
ETALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUCHA, JOHN EVAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret C. McHugh
MARGARET C MCHUGH KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLPMS 22 IP DOCKETING 1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for publishing, reviewing, editing, searching and disseminating scholarly, scientific, and academic communications, namely, abstracts, articles, reviews, comments, book chapters, and posters in the field of science, based on user preferences; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating, editing, viewing, managing, uploading, downloading, storing, and sharing scholarly, scientific, and academic documents in the field of science, namely, abstracts, articles, reviews, comments, book chapters and posters in the field of science; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for identifying, hosting, and joining on-line forums and discussions based on user preferences for scholarly, scientific, and academic research and investigation; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for scholarly, scientific, and academic research and investigation, namely, for sharing knowledge and information in the field of science, project collaboration, namely, for collaborating on scholarly, scientific, and academic shared documents, and scientific publishing, namely, collaborating on publication of scholarly, scientific, and academic articles, reviews, book chapters and posters; Computer services, namely, application service provider services for hosting software applications for selecting, managing, publishing, reviewing, monitoring and analyzing scholarly, scientific, and academic websites, blogs, social media profiles, and other scholarly, scientific, and academic online content and documents for others based upon user preferences, user defined information, personal profiles and information; Providing a searchable online database for browsing scholarly, scientific and academic documents, and for sharing information and documents in the field of science; Cloud-based collaboration platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for enabling researchers, scholars, scientists, publishers and editors to collect, edit, organize, modify, transmit, store, review and share data and information relating to various projects and tasks for database management and task management purposes; Platform as a service (PaaS) services, featuring a computer software platform that enables publishing of articles, reviews, comments, book chapters and posters in the field of science, reviewing of articles, reviews, comments, book chapters and posters in the field of science for editorial purposes, delivery of messages between computer network users, accessing of shared scholarly, scientific, and academic documents, organization of scientific data into databases and accessing of communication-driven workflows in the fields of scholarly, scientific and academic research, investigation and publishing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |