USPTO serial 87223494
KINETIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINETIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
ROBERT P. MICHAL CARTER DELUCA FARRELL & SCHMIDT, LLP445 BROAD HOLLOW ROADMELVILLE, NY 11747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's activity kits comprising laser cut toy wood blocks in the nature of toy building blocks, plastic tubes and metal gears for building toy guns in the nature of toy construction sets, construction toys featuring rubber band guns, catapults, trebuchets, paper airplane launchers and ballisters for building small scale model toys, and toy plastic peg boards with toy wires for making designs on the toy peg boards in the field of science, sold as a unit; children's activity kits comprising laser cut toy wood blocks in the nature of toy building blocks, toy wooden construction blocks, bean bags for building catapults, toy gears and cranks in the nature of toy construction sets for building a spiral art drawing machine in the field of engineering, sold as a unit; children's activity kits comprising battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects for building arcade games using a common platform in the field of coding; children's activity kits comprising children's multiple activity toys with printed books, sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2017 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |