Drawing for Serial No. 87224006

USPTO serial 87224006

Serial No. 87224006

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 87224006?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn Hsu

THOMAS R. KINGSBURY BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC.10 EAST FIRESTONE BLVD.AKRON, OH 44317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires for vehicles; retreaded tires for vehicles; tire casing for vehicles tires; adhesive rubber patches for repairing tubes or tiresACTIVE—
035Retail store services and wholesale store services for tires for vehicles; retail store services and wholesale store services for fuelACTIVE—
037Retreading of tires; check and maintenance of tires and parts for vehicles; repair and maintenance of tires and parts for vehicles; refuel services, namely, vehicle fueling servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 7, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 7, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance