USPTO serial 87224491
BQE CORE SCHEDULING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BQE CORE SCHEDULING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ara A. Babaian
ARA A. BABAIAN ENCORE LAW GROUP LLP1100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 3305Los Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer and mobile device software to create, customize, and manage invoices; computer and mobile device software to create and manage budgets; computer and mobile device software to create and manage projects; computer and mobile device software to automate creation of invoices; computer and mobile device software to create, customize, print, export, and e-mail financial reports, business reports, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, cash flow statements, and taxable sales reports; computer software to track time worked by employees and subcontractors; computer and mobile device software, namely, for use in for accounting; computer and mobile device software for use in managing, organizing and sharing data on computer server on a global computer network; Computer software, namely, for database management, for service desk management, for accounting timekeeping, for employee time management and for time recording for professional services firms | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create, customize, and manage invoices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create and manage budgets; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create and manage projects; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to automate creation of invoices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create, customize, print, export, and e-mail financial reports, business reports, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, cash flow statements, and taxable sales reports; software as a service (SAAS) services to track time worked by employees and subcontractors; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management, for service desk management, for accounting; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software to automate creation of invoices; Computer technology technical support services, namely, help desk services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and web site problems; data hosting services, namely, server hosting; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use in managing, organizing and sharing data on computer server on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BQE Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BQE Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BQE CORE SCHEDULING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |