Drawing for ECSTACY

USPTO serial 87225810

ECSTACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECSTACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT ROADUTICA, OH 43080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003non-medicated soaps, namely, gift soapsACTIVEJan 31, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 14, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 14, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 14, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 13, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 31, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 26, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 4, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 21, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 6, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 15, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 15, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 15, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 18, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 18, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 7, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance