USPTO serial 87226192
SEAMLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEAMLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Patterson
WILLIAM B. PATTERSON PATTERSON & SHERIDAN LLP24 GREENWAY PLAZASUITE 1600HOUSTON, TX 77046Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Beverage ware; cups; drinking glasses, namely, tumblers; jugs; mugs; temperature retaining vessels; vacuum container for hot or cold food and drink; beer growlers; insulated food and drink containers; drink holder; stainless steel drink holders; stainless steel tumblers; stainless steel drinking glasses; stainless steel beverage ware; insulating sleeve holder for beverage cups, bottles, and cans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |