Drawing for M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 87226480

M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MODAL COLLABORATIVE INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colette A. Durst

Colette A. Durst 3M Innovative Properties Company3M Center, 2501 Hudson Road220 9E 01St. Paul, MN 55144

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for natural language, speech, speaker, voice and/or voice-print recognition, identification, verification and/or processing for use in the fields of transcription, healthcare documentation, healthcare records management; computer software development tools; computer software and computer software development tools for speech and language recognition; computer software for natural language, speech, speaker, voice and/or voice-print recognition, identification, verification and/or processing for use in the fields of medical records, medical coding, compliance and health information managementACTIVE—
035Medical transcription services; medical coding servicesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, training in the use of computer software for voice recognition and medical recordsACTIVE—
042Computer software consultation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; and computer software designACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 29, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 21, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance