USPTO serial 87227524
MAXY HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXY HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Paterson, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Anti-fatigue floor mat; Anti-slip floor coverings for use on staircases; Area rugs; Artificial lawn; Beach mats; Carpet underlay; Carpet underlays; Carpet underlays, namely, rug grippers; Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; Door mats; Door mats of India rubber; Door mats of India rubber or textile; Door mats of textile; Floor coverings; Floor coverings, namely, floor runners; Floor mats in the nature of non-slip pads for use under apparatus to prevent slippage; Hard surface coverings for floors; Non-slip bathtub mats; Non-slip mats for baths; Pet feeding mats; Pet litter pan floor mats; Plastic bath mats; Rubber bath mats; Rubber mats; Rugs; Rugs, namely, floor runners; Textile bath mats; Underlay for carpets; Wooden door mats | ACTIVE | May 5, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |