USPTO serial 87230306
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTINS, ODETTE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel Karni Schmidt
Joel Karni Schmidt Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th Street, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOME MONITORING SYSTEM COMPRISED OF ONE OR MORE RADIO FREQUENCY SENSORS THAT ARE USED TO MONITOR AND PROCESS WIRELESS SIGNALS TO DETECT, IDENTIFY, AND LOCATE MOVEMENT AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE NATURE OF A MOBILE APPLICATION FOR HOME MONITORING AND USED TO DETECT, IDENTIFY AND LOCATE MOVEMENT PATTERNS IN THE HOME FOR SECURITY AND MOTION-BASED AUTOMATION OF CONNECTED DEVICES IN HOMES; ALL OF THE FOREGOING RELATING TO HOME SECURITY AND MOTION-BASED HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEMS AND NOT RELATING TO WIRELESS NURSE CALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |