USPTO serial 87231080
DELIVERY DUDES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELIVERY DUDES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DELRAY BEACH, FL
DELRAY BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi Tandy
Heidi Tandy Berger Singerman LLP1450 Brickell AveSuite 1900Miami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Ashtrays; Lighters for smokers; Matchboxes; Smoking pipe cleaners; Smoking pipes; Cigarette rolling papers; Oral vaporizers for smokers; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; Smokeless cigar vaporizer pipes; Smokeless cigarette vaporizer pipe; Smokers' oral vaporizer refill cartridges sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |