USPTO serial 87233033
MONSARRAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 4, 2017
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MONSARRAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge, MA, US
Cambridge, MA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Thibodeau, Jr.
David J. Thibodeau, Jr. VLP Law Group, LLPP.O. Box 52268BOSTON, MA 02205-2268UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Designing and developing computer game software and video game software for use with computers, video game program systems and computer networks | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |