Drawing for VASCO TRUST FOR THE DIGITAL WORLD

USPTO serial 87233126

VASCO TRUST FOR THE DIGITAL WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VASCO TRUST FOR THE DIGITAL WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Mikulina

JENNIFER M. MIKULINA MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP444 W. Lake Street, Suite 4000CHICAGO, IL 60606-0029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for assessing the risk associated with end user identities, namely, software for identification verification, ensuring security of end-user identities, ensuring authenticity and integrity of transactions submitted by end users, and detection of unauthorized access to networks; software for application, transaction and identity security related to mobile device applications, namely, software for authenticating, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges to users of mobile device applications and for ensuring authenticity and integrity of transactions submitted by users of mobile device applications; software for electronic signature verification; software for data security; software for secure transaction authentication; software for the protection of on-line transactions and data transfer by electronic means; software for access control to computers, electronic networks, web sites and databases; software for electronic generation of authentication credentials and signatures; optical readers; electronic security tokens in the nature of a fob-like device for use by authorized users of a computer, website, database or network to facilitate authentication; portable digital electronic devices for generation of authentication credentials and digital signatures; portable digital electronic devices for data security in online transactions and electronic data transferACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing secure or authenticated access to computer networks and websitesACTIVE—
042Electronic signature verification services using technology to authentic user identity; Software as a Service for the digitization and automation of business workflows; testing, analysis, and evaluation services in the telecommunications field, for the purpose of certification and designing, updating, and maintaining computer software of others; consultation services, namely, consultation in the field of data security; computer security services namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach in the financial field; computer security services, namely, providing secure or authenticated access to computer networks and websitesACTIVE—
045Providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance