USPTO serial 87233162
HEADLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEADLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morland C. Fischer
MORLAND C FISCHER LAW OFFICES OF MORLAND C FISCHER2030 MAIN STREET SUITE 1300IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | A metal anchoring device to be attached to one end of a steel reinforcement bar (i.e., rebar) to withstand tensile loads and thereby hold the reinforcement bar in place when the reinforcement bar is embedded within a concrete structure, namely, a building, a bridge, or a roadway | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |