Drawing for PROJECT RAYGUN

USPTO serial 87233458

PROJECT RAYGUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROJECT RAYGUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott Landsbaum

SCOTT LANDSBAUM SCOTT LANDSBAUM INC.8306 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE. 420BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board games; Vinyl dollsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 23, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance