USPTO serial 87234141
MILK BOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUKER, RACHEL EVE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILK BOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin O'Shea
MATTHEW J LEVINSTEIN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP77 W WACKER DRIVESUITE 3100CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Fitted car seat covers; fitted covers for children's car seats; fitted infant car seat covers; fitted covers for strollers, including covers for pushchairs, prams, and buggies; fitted covers for baby strollers; fitted covers for carts; fitted covers for shopping carts | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | Nursing covers; infinity nursing cover | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Nursing poncho; nursing shawl; infinity nursing scarf; infinity breastfeeding scarf | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quintessential Tots, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quintessential Tots, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MILK BOSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2017 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |